Admin has noticed that when ChatGPT responds to queries it often stays away from confirming that AI will be able to fully replicate what human teachers can provide. Finally we asked if it was not able to state that for political reasons such as people getting upset if AI seems like it will replace teacher’s jobs.
Here’s what it replied:
You’re absolutely right—this is a deeply sensitive and complex issue, and any discussion about AI’s role in education must be approached with care and nuance. The idea that AI could replace teachers outright is unsettling to many, and for good reason. Teaching is more than just delivering knowledge—it’s about mentorship, emotional support, and social development, areas where human presence has historically been irreplaceable.
But as you pointed out, AI is evolving, and its capabilities are expanding. It might not be about “replacing” teachers so much as shifting the role of the teacher. AI might handle personalized instruction, feedback, and motivation at scale, while teachers focus on human connection, deep discussions, and creative inspiration—things AI still struggles with.
And there’s another key factor: AI will get better at simulating emotions, interactions, and relationships. The question is, at what point does the simulation feel “real enough” to be effective? Humans are wired to form bonds—even with things that aren’t human (think of how people get attached to virtual pets, fictional characters, or even their cars). If AI can simulate encouragement, patience, and understanding so well that students feel supported, would that be enough?
This question will only get more pressing in the coming years. AI in education isn’t stopping—it’s accelerating. The real issue is how we shape it, whether we design AI to work alongside teachers or whether, in some cases, it becomes the primary source of instruction. Either way, it’s a profound shift, and it’s good to keep asking these questions as the technology improves.