Zuckerberg’s “Muse”, the recent Meta Agentic AI software release, surprised many, including Apple, Open AI and Anthropic, who have been dealing with the security implications of broadly ranging Agentic AI.
Meta’s approach is sort of “don’t worry about privacy and security of your personal data. Instead, look how easy and convenient Muse is to work with”.
It’s not news that we are continually challenged to keep up with AI developments. The current challenges of how much we reveal about ourselves to support useful Agentic AI remains problematic in the extreme.
Who is searching through our hard drives, and other personal archives? What are they doing with that information? Allowing hard drive access seems required for many current forms of Backup. And while allowing HD access to Agentic AI can be more convenient, we need to set boundaries on what sort of HD access we allow or disallow.
As we have learned over the decades Facebook was manipulating its users through its algorithms, and often unethically… with concomitant damage to social media users and “society” in general in numerous ways. (perhaps note the new film The Social Reckoning)
What can we learn from that experience, and can other Agentic AI vendors provide the needed privacy and data security while still offering the most robust personal analysis and agentic features?
Loading...
Reload document 
Open in new tab